Respond to security alerts faster
The real risk in most security operations isn’t the alert nobody catches — it’s the five hundred alerts that bury it. The console lights up all day with low-severity noise, duplicate firings of the same event, and findings missing the one piece of context that would tell you whether to care: which asset, whose service, how exposed. By the time an analyst has manually enriched the third alert of the morning, fatigue has set in, and the genuinely critical one is just another red row to scroll past. Speed of response is the whole game, and triage is where it’s lost.
Skynet takes the triage off the human’s plate. An agent watches the incoming alert stream, collapses duplicates, and enriches each one with the context that actually drives a decision — the affected asset, its owner, recent related activity — pulled from the sources you connect. It classifies severity, drafts the first response and the relevant runbook steps, and for true criticals, escalates to on-call with a written summary so the responder starts oriented instead of cold. The noise gets handled; the human’s attention goes to what’s real.
How the triage agent works
Watch and dedupe the stream
Connect your alert sources and the agent reads the incoming stream as it fires, collapsing repeat firings of the same event into one. The first thing it removes is the volume that was hiding the signal.
Enrich with context
For each alert, the agent pulls the context that decides severity — which asset is involved, who owns it, what recent activity touches it — from your unified memory. The analyst stops doing the lookup that used to eat the first ten minutes of every investigation.
Classify and draft the response
It assigns a severity, drafts the first response, and lays out the relevant runbook steps grounded in your own procedures. The first message in the thread is already useful instead of “looking into it.”
Escalate the real criticals
When something crosses the line, the agent escalates to on-call — because Skynet takes action in Slack and email, it pages the right person with a written summary: what fired, the enriched context, and the suggested next steps. The responder reads one message and moves.
You build this from a plain-language prompt — no code — and run it continuously against the stream.
Where this lands
The console stops being a wall of noise to scroll. Duplicates collapse, every alert arrives already enriched, severity is sorted, and the criticals reach on-call with the context written down. Your team spends its minutes on the alerts that matter and its judgment on the decisions that need a person — not on copy-pasting asset IDs to figure out whether to care.
Frequently asked questions
No — not without approval. The agent triages, enriches, classifies, drafts, and escalates automatically, but any containment action that touches your environment waits for a human to approve it. You define what it may do unattended and what it must ask first.
From the sources you connect, held in unified memory — your asset inventory, ownership records, and recent activity. The agent attaches the asset, its owner, and related events so severity is a decision backed by context, not a guess.
By removing the work that causes it. It dedupes repeat firings, enriches each alert so analysts skip the manual lookup, and sorts severity — so the team sees a short list of real items instead of scrolling hundreds of raw rows.
For true criticals the agent pages on-call in Slack or by email with a written summary — what fired, the enriched context, and suggested runbook steps — so the responder starts oriented. Routing happens in the tools your team already watches.