Client Revisions
Revision rounds rarely fail on craft. They fail on memory. A client asks for a warmer palette in a Tuesday call, contradicts it in a Slack thread on Thursday, and by round three nobody can say which version they actually signed off on. You end up defending a decision from three weeks ago with no record of who made it, and the safest move is to just redo the work. That is where the margin goes.
Skynet holds the thread. It reads your project channel, your comment threads, and your file versions, and builds unified memory of what was asked, what you shipped, and what was approved. When a new comment lands, it can tell you whether it is new direction or a reversal of something already settled — with the receipt attached.
How it works
Connect the places feedback lives
Feedback arrives everywhere: email, Slack, comments on the file, a voice note. Point Skynet at those sources and it pulls them into one timeline per project, tied to the version they refer to.
Track versions against decisions
Each round gets pinned to what changed and why. Skynet keeps the link between a request and the version that answered it, so the history of the work is legible without you maintaining a spreadsheet.
Flag contradictions before you build
When new feedback conflicts with an approved decision, the agent surfaces it and quotes both. You decide whether it is a change of mind or a misunderstanding — and you have something to point at when you ask.
Close each round in writing
At the end of a round, Skynet drafts a short recap: what was requested, what you changed, what is still open. You approve it, it goes to the client, and round four starts from an agreed baseline.
Build it from a prompt
Describe how your revision process should run and let the agent hold the record.
What you get back is fewer rounds, and better ones. The client sees a clear record instead of a moving target, and you stop paying for the same revision twice. The taste is still yours — Skynet just makes sure nobody has to argue about what was agreed.